• 25.09.2024

    Head of the Program:
    Prof. Dr. Philipp Schreck
    Friede-Springer Endowed Chair of Business Ethics and Management Accounting
    Martin-Luther-University, Halle-Wittenberg
    More information: https://unternehmensethik.wiwi.uni-halle.de/team/schreck/

    Prof. Dr. Philipp Schreck (born in 1978) studied Business Administration at the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) in Munich (Diploma, 2005) and earned his Ph.D. with an empirical study on the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility in 2008 (LMU, Munich). In 2014, he earned the post-doc degree Habilitation with different works on Accounting and Ethics. These works were mostly experimental studies on the unintended effects of incentive systems in organizations (LMU, Munich). Since 2015, Philipp has held the Friede-Springer Endowed Chair of Business Ethics and Management Accounting (bema) at the Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg. He is also a member of the management board of the Wittenberg Center for Global Ethics (WCGE).

    The research projects conducted at bema follow the principle of evidence-based business ethics. The goal of this research is to develop normative propositions based on solid empirical research. In line with this goal, most of the research projects at bema employ empirical methods, mostly by means of behavioral experiments. Current research projects deal with topics such as preconditions of human cooperation, ethical decision-making & behavior, compliance &integrity, and ethical aspects of digitalization.

    Philipp’s articles have appeared in journals such as Business Ethics Quarterly, Business & Society, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, European Accounting Review, Journal of Business Ethics, and Review of Managerial Science. In 2018, he joined the editorial board of the Journal of Business Economics. He has also had visiting appointments at the Wharton School, University of St. Gallen, University of Sydney, and HEC Paris.

     

    Academic Program Manager:

    Manon Filler
    Martin-Luther-University, Halle-Wittenberg

    Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist vor Spambots geschützt! Zur Anzeige muss JavaScript eingeschaltet sein.

    Phone: (+49) 345 55-23319
    More information: Manon Filler | LinkedIn


    Program Coordinator:
    Tatjana Arnold
    Wittenberg Center for Global Ethics
    Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist vor Spambots geschützt! Zur Anzeige muss JavaScript eingeschaltet sein.Phone: (+49) 3491 5079-116
    More information: Tatjana Arnold | LinkedIn

  • 25.09.2024

    Apply Now – Join the Doctoral Academy

     

    We welcome doctoral candidates who are committed to exploring the ethical, social and sustainable dimensions of business, leadership and society. The Doctoral Academy offers a unique opportunity to engage across disciplines, develop your research and connect with an international network.

    Who Can Apply

    • PhD candidates in philosophy, economics, management, social sciences or related fields whose research touches on ethics, responsibility or sustainability. Early-career scholars and advanced Master’s students are also welcome.
    • You may apply at any stage of your research process – whether you are designing your study, gathering data, or writing up. The modular format allows flexible participation in Writing Retreats and Academic Weeks.

    How to Apply

    1. Prepare your application documents (see list below).
    2. Submit all documents via our online application portal (see link below). We will only consider complete applications submitted through the portal – not documents sent by e-mail.
    3. Application deadlines for Writing Retreats, Spring School and Summer School will be announced throughout the year. Keep an eye on this page or our LinkedIn Page of the Wittenberg Center for Global Ethics for the latest.
    4. After submission, you will receive a confirmation of receipt.

    Application Documents (mandatory)

    • Motivation letter (in English, max. 500 words) summarising your research idea and why you wish to participate.
    • Curriculum vitae (in English)

    We look for applicants who:

    • Present a research topic with strong relevance for ethical, social or sustainability challenges
    • Are motivated to engage in interdisciplinary exchange and feedback
    • Are willing to collaborate and share insights with peer researchers from diverse backgrounds
    • Commit to using the module actively (attending sessions, contributing to discussions, applying insights to their work)

     

    Apply now for our  Summer School “Normative Arguments and Practical Implications“ via our Online Application Portal (August 30th - September 3rd, 2026)

    We accept max. 20 participants for each event and will send out acceptance letters on a rolling basis so our spots may fill out quickly!

  • 25.09.2024

    Study Program – Building Ethical Research Skills

    The Doctoral Academy’s Study Program combines rigorous academic training with dedicated writing and reflection time. Across the academic year, participants can flexibly take part in three core components: the Spring School on Experimental Methods, the Summer School on Normative Arguments and Practical Implications, and focused Writing Retreats.

     

    Spring School “Experimental Methods” (Course Description)

    Research on morality and business has flourished in recent years, offering both fascinating insights into how individuals and organizations behave and compelling arguments for how they should behave. The breadth of this field brings together diverse disciplines and methodologies – creating exciting opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration but also posing challenges for young researchers who may be unfamiliar with certain empirical approaches.

    This Spring School is designed to provide PhD scholars with a foundation in experimental research within normative contexts. Our goal is to equip participants – especially those with little to no empirical training (e.g., ethicists or philosophers) – with practical tools to begin designing and conducting their own experiments. At the same time, we aim to raise awareness among empirically trained researchers (e.g., economists or psychologists) of the unique challenges and ethical considerations that arise when applying empirical methods to normative questions.

    Participants will be guided through the process of developing their own research ideas and experimental designs, with an emphasis on how to ask and answer questions with ethical and societal relevance. Beyond study design, the course also emphasizes the translation of findings into practice through collaboration with both academic researchers and practitioners.

     

    Summer School “Normative Arguments and Practical Implications” (Course Description)

    Research in business ethics is increasingly attentive to the intersection of theory and practice, raising questions not only about what makes for strong normative arguments but also about how such insights can shape organizational and societal life. This field thrives on its interdisciplinary nature – drawing on philosophy, economics, psychology, and management – yet this diversity can also pose challenges for PhD scholars navigating unfamiliar approaches and audiences.

    The Summer School provides participants with the conceptual grounding to advance their work in business ethics and related fields. Through a combination of lectures, workshops, and peer discussions, participants reflect on what makes for compelling research questions, how normative work can generate real-world value, and how to communicate their findings to different audiences – from academic peers to practitioners and policymakers.

     

    Writing Retreats (Description)

    The Writing Retreats offer participants dedicated time and space to focus on their individual research projects in a concentrated yet collegial atmosphere. Held in a quiet setting conducive to writing and reflection, the retreats balance structured academic exchange with independent work.

    The retreats typically include short sessions for peer feedback and discussions on challenges in the writing process – from structuring arguments and clarifying contributions to maintaining motivation and momentum. The goal of the retreats is to help participants make tangible progress on their dissertations.

     

    Example Schedules (For orientation only)
    Curious about what a typical academic week or writing retreat looks like? Below you can find a PDF with example schedules from a previous Spring and Summer School as well as a Writing Retreat of the Doctoral Academy. These examples illustrate the structure and types of sessions, so you know what to expect. Please note that the content, speakers, structure and timing may vary for each upcoming program.

    Example Schedules

    Participation Fee

    Participation in the Doctoral Academy’s academic weeks and writing retreats involves a fee to cover accommodation and meals.

    • Writing Retreat:€50.00 (net)
    • Academic Week:€150.00 (net) 

    Included in the fee:

    • Accommodation during the program week (Sunday until Thursday)
    • Breakfast and Dinners
    • Two shared lunches during the week

    Not included:

    • Travel costs to and from Wittenberg

     

    Cooperation with VHB

    As part of our cooperation with the "Verband der Hochschullehrerinnen und Hochschullehrer für Betriebswirtschaft e.V." (VHB), we are pleased to share selected offerings from the VHB ProDok programme with our doctoral researchers. 

    Recommended VHB courses will be featured here soon.

  • 25.09.2024

    The program is aimed at DOCTORAL STUDENTS

    • working on topics related to business or leadership ethics from all academic disciplines
    • with a background in business administration, economics, philosophy, law or other relevant
    • enrolled at a European University
    • late-stage Master students with a clear interest in academia and early-stage career researchers are also welcome.
    • we accept max. 20 participants for each event and will send out acceptance letters on a rolling basis so our spots may fill out quickly
  • 25.09.2024

    From Doctoral Program to Doctoral Academy – A New Chapter in Ethical Research Training

    History and Development

    The Doctoral Academy continues and expands the tradition of doctoral education at the Wittenberg Center for Global Ethics (WCGE). From 2016 to 2026, the WCGE hosted the Doctoral Program "Ethics and Responsible Leadership in Business", generously supported by the Karl Schlecht Foundation (KSG). Over these years, the program provided an intensive three-year structured curriculum for cohorts of doctoral researchers. Each year, a new group of PhD candidates entered the program and engaged in a combination of core courses, elective seminars, regular Jour Fixe meetings, research colloquia and mini colloquia for presenting work in progress. This structured format laid a strong foundation for WCGE’s role as a hub for ethical research and doctoral support.

    Transition to the Doctoral Academy (from 2024)

    In 2024, the Doctoral Program evolved into the Doctoral Academy – a more flexible and inclusive model designed to respond to the growing diversity of research projects, disciplines, and international partnerships connected to WCGE. While the Doctoral Program operated in fixed three-year cohorts, the Doctoral Academy now offers modular participation, where max. 20 doctoral candidates for each event can join at different stages of their research. This evolution reflects WCGE’s commitment to shaping a dynamic research community – one that remains academically rigorous while addressing contemporary ethical challenges in a rapidly changing world.

    Our Mission

    The Doctoral Academy aims to:

    • Promote interdisciplinary ethical research of high academic quality.
    • Support the personal and professional development of early-career researchers.
    • Bridge academic insights and societal impact through dialogue with practitioners.

    Partners

    The Doctoral Academy is hosted by the WCGE and the Friede Springer Chair of Business Ethics and Management Accounting at Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg. It is generously funded by the Karl Schlecht Foundation.

  • Academy
    25.09.2024

    Where research meets responsibility

    The Doctoral Academy hosted by the WCGE and the Friede Springer Chair of Business Ethics and Management Accounting at Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg is an interdisciplinary training and research community for doctoral candidates working on diverse questions of ethics, responsibility, and sustainability.

    The Academy combines academic “schools” on key research and methodological topics with “writing retreats” designed to foster focus and exchange:

    • Spring School: Experimental Research– exploring empirical methods and their ethical dimensions (6 ECTS),
    • Summer School: Normative Arguments and Practical Implications– engaging with moral theory and its relevance for real-world decision-making (6 ECTS), and
    • Writing Retreats– providing space for structured feedback, peer exchange, and concentrated writing time.


    Doctoral candidates from philosophy, economics, management, the social sciences, and related fields are invited to join and participate according to their individual research phase. The modular design allows researchers to engage with specific academic weeks that best support their projects.

    Key Dates for Upcoming Events

    • 30 August - 03 September 2026 – Summer School (Normative Arguments & Practical Implications)
    • 06 - 10 December 2026 – Writing Retreat
    • 14 - 18 February 2027 – Spring School (Experimental Research)
    • 11 - 15 April 2027 – Writing Retreat

    Application forms for each academic week (max. 20 participants per event) are released sequentially throughout the year, allowing candidates to apply for individual modules that match their research needs.

    The Academy is funded by the Karl Schlecht Foundation.

     What Participants Gain

    • Opportunities to participate in interdisciplinary academic courses
    • Skill training on experimental research design
    • A vibrant international community of emerging scholars committed to ethical inquiry and social impact
    • Dedicated writing time and peer feedback on research projects
    • Opportunities to network of scholars and practitioners

     

  • 10.05.2022

    Welche Erwartungen haben die Menschen an politische Interessenvertretung in der Wirtschaft? Und wie sollten Unternehmen darauf eingehen? In unserer neuen Studie geben wir Antworten.

    Unternehmerisches Lobbying wird kontrovers diskutiert: Mache wünschen sich mehr unternehmerische Kompetenz bei der Lösung gesellschaftlicher Probleme. Andere fürchten vor allem Manipulationen durch einflussreiche Branchen und Konzerne. Dieses Spannungsfeld ist der Ausgangspunkt für unsere Studie „Verantwortliches Lobbying im nachhaltigen Wandel“ (Autoren: Prof. Philipp Schreck, Dr. Martin von Broock, Moritz Appels).

    Mit einem innovativen Studiendesign (Kombination von Befragung und Experiment) sind wir folgenden Fragen nachgegangen: Wie beurteilen die Menschen die Lobby-Arbeit von Unternehmen? Welche Kriterien beeinflussen die Akzeptanz von Lobbying? Und welche Handlungsempfehlungen lassen sich daraus für verantwortungsvolle politische Interessenvertretung ableiten? Die Kernergebnisse im Überblick:

    Wahrnehmung von Lobbying: Im Prinzip sinnvoll, aber konkret schädlich

    Die große Mehrheit der Befragten (93%) schätzt den Einfluss von Lobbying auf die deutsche Politik als hoch ein. 78% Prozent bewerten diesen Einfluss negativ. In der Folge wünschen sich 89% eine stärkere Einschränkung von Lobbying. Allerdings ist gleichzeitig eine knappe Mehrheit von 52% der Ansicht, dass Lobbying politische Entscheidungsprozesse im Prinzip verbessern könnte.

    Für Unternehmen bedeutet das: Da politische Interessenvertretung im Prinzip als sinnvoll erachtet wird, lohnen sich Investitionen in eine bessere Lobbying-Praxis. Denn die Akzeptanz unternehmerischen Lobbyings entscheidet über die „license to sit at the table“.

    Stärkster Akzeptanzhebel: Die Position

    Am konkreten Beispiel Klimaschutz wird deutlich: Die stärkste Hebelwirkung hat die im Lobbying vertretene Position. Setzt sich ein Unternehmen für mehr (statt weniger) Klimaschutz ein, dann stößt die Lobby-Maßnahme auf deutlich stärkere Akzeptanz bei den Befragten.

    Für Unternehmen folgt daraus: Interessenvertretung gegen ambitionierten Klimaschutz hat wenig Aussicht auf Akzeptanz. Trotzdem muss unternehmerische Kritik an Klimaschutzmaßnahmen möglich bleiben. Für mehr Akzeptanz sollte Lobbying dann aber (1) das unternehmerische Bekenntnis zum Klimaschutz mindestens nicht unterminieren und (2) bessere Alternativen zur Erreichung des jeweiligen Ziels benennen.

    Wechselwirkungen: Konsistenz entscheidet, Transparenz flankiert

    Von progressivem Klimalobbying profitieren vor allem Unternehmen mit hoher ökologischer Reputation. Umgekehrt verschafft ihnen ihre Reputation aber keinen „Kredit“ für weniger ambitionierte Lobbymaßnahmen. Auch Unternehmen mit geringer ökologischer Reputation können mit progressiverem Klimalobbying ihre Akzeptanz steigern. Die Effekte fallen aber geringer aus.

    Heißt: Wer sein Klimaschutz-Lobbying von "defensiv“ auf „progressiv“ umstellt, kann nur begrenzte Quick-Wins erwarten und muss zunächst in seine ökologische Performance investieren. Demgegenüber führt defensives Klimalobbying in jedem Fall zu Akzeptanzverlusten. Ein Teil jener Verluste kann allerdings durch eine bessere Transparenz im Lobbying aufgefangen werden.

    Entscheidend für die Akzeptanz von Lobbying ist also die Konsistenz (oder Integrität) von Haltung, Handeln und Historie eines Unternehmens im Einklang mit gesellschaftlichen Zielstellungen. Dabei spielt Transparenz zwar nur eine flankierende Rolle; sie zahlt sich aber in jedem Fall aus. Unternehmen, die in die Akzeptanz ihres Lobbyings investieren wollen, sollten sich also an der Reihenfolge „Was“ vor „Wer“ vor „Wie“ orientieren.

    Download der Studie „Verantwortliches Lobbying im nachhaltigen Wandel“

  • 10.12.2021

     gebauer

    Title of Dissertation: Reframing Compliance – investing in enabling conditions

    Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Andreas Suchanek
    University: HHL – Handelshochschule Leipzig
    Scholarship: sdw – Stiftung der Deutschen Wirtschaft
    Cohort: 8th Cohort, since 2021
    Email: Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist vor Spambots geschützt! Zur Anzeige muss JavaScript eingeschaltet sein.

    [accordion activeIndex=""]

    [item title="Short Abstract"]

    For corporations, complying with the law is an essential prerequisite to do business: It signals trustworthiness to clients and can be a competitive edge, whereas non-compliance threatens severe sanctions. For the corporations’ workforce, complying is not equally rational but puts the entire company at risk: typically, an employee perceives compliance with the rules as an (unattractive) refrain. This often corresponds with a low probability of detection in the event of a compliance violation and hence a low risk of suffering drastic (personal) consequences.

    Considering existing legal efforts, I intend to provide employees with (rational) orientation, why to behave in compliance with the rules through complementary ethical means.

    In this conceptual work I use a transactional ethics with economic method i.e., facilitating game theory to examine (un-)ethical interactions with normative concepts from ethics.

    Reframing compliance from cost to an investment in future collaboration offers employees to understand, why compliance is the right thing to do. Employees need to recognize compliance as a worthwhile self-restraint. Compliance (self-restraint) becomes the rational alternative and an enabling condition if otherwise the basis for business (cooperation) erodes.


    [/item]

    [item title="Research Interests"]

    • Corporate Compliance
    • Integrity
    • Behavioral economics
    • Normative business ethics

    [/item]

    [item title="Education"]

    • 2017, Master of Laws, International Business and Company Law, SRH Hochschule Heidelberg, Germany
    • 2015, Bachelor of Laws, Business Law, Universität Kassel, Germany

    [/item]

    [item title="Professional and Academic Career"]

    • 2018-2021, Compliance Officer, Allianz Global Investors GmbH, Frankfurt a.M., Germany
    • 2017-2018, Trainee Compliance Management, DZ BANK AG, Frankfurt a.M., Germany
    • 2015-2016, Student Employee, Allianz Global Investors GmbH, Frankfurt a.M., Germany
    • 2015, Intern Governance, Risk & Compliance, PricewaterhouseCoopers WPG AG, Frankfurt a.M., Germany
    • 2013-2015, Student Assistant, Universität Kassel, Kassel, Germany

    [/item]

    [item title="Publications"]

    • Petrushevska, M. & Gebauer, S. (2022), Nudging Corporate Compliance und Integrität – Auf der Grundlage des ethischen Kompasses. comply 7(3), 14-16.

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Talks"]

    • ComplianceNet 2023, Washington, D.C., USA, Paper: "Rules alone are not enough – Why corruption prevention needs integrity"

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Posters"]

    • Poster from sdw-Promovierendenforum „Reframing Compliance – investing in enabling conditions”, summer 2022

    [/item]

    [item title="Memberships"]

    • Bundesverband der Compliance Manager (BCM) e.V.

    [/item]
    [/accordion]

     

  • 10.12.2021

     gruetzner

    Title of Dissertation: What if…? Counterfactual reasoning in ethical decision-making in business contexts

    Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Philipp Schreck
    University: MLU Halle-Wittenberg
    Scholarship: HaVo-Stipendium
    Cohort: 8th Cohort, since 2021
    Email: Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist vor Spambots geschützt! Zur Anzeige muss JavaScript eingeschaltet sein.

    [accordion activeIndex=""]

    [item title="Short Abstract"]

    Counterfactual explanations have become a popular way of producing more transparent, and thus, more ethical artificially intelligent decision makers. But how are counterfactual explanations of AI impacting human behaviour - and do they lead to better outcomes than alternative ways of dealing with AI?

    What if…? That’s a question often asked when contemplating prior events and decisions. But is the consideration of possible outcomes integral to the way we make ethical decisions? The core of my project aims to identify how counterfactual thinking influences ethical decision making within a business context, drawing from insights from cognitive neuroscience, behavioural economics, psychology, philosophy and decision theory more broadly construed. A counterfactual is any statement that is counter to the facts, meaning any statement that is not true in the given states of affairs. Counterfactual thinking is reasoning that reflects upon that which is not the case - it is used when evaluating how the past could have turned out, and how the future may develop by mentally creating possible alternative scenarios to reality.

    I have been especially interested in the way counterfactual explanations are being used to explain and/or interpret the outcomes of decisions made by artificially intelligent agents (AI). In a fastly developing world where more and more decisions are being made through the support of or solely by AI, many argue that transparency is being required to ensure that all AI-made decisions are fair and ethical. One popular attempt at becoming more transparent is for the AI to generate a list of counterfactual statements in addition to the decision made; For example, an AI used in a hiring process might not only provide the decision that a candidate should be rejected, but also provide some insights on how the application would need to differ to have been considered for a position. So, a candidate might be informed that the system would have recommended them for the position, if they had five more years of experience or if they were fluent in another language or if they had participated in relevant training.

    These kinds of explanations are said to have two main benefits; A human decision-maker would be able to overrule an AI made decision on the basis of disagreeing with the counterfactual provided (e.g., in the example above, by deciding that speaking another language was not essential to the given job), and a person affected by such a decision is also immediately being given ground to contest the AI made decision (e.g., in the example above, by providing proof that they had participated in relevant training after all).

    My work aims to investigate the way counterfactuals influence both the cognitive decision making processes within a business context. With more and more organisations adopting counterfactual explainability models for their artificial intelligence systems, understanding the way counterfactuals shape decision making is integral to ensuring that AI is being used responsibly.

    I aim to apply experimental methods as used in behavioural economics and psychology to identify how counterfactual thought impacts decision making, and which kinds of counterfactuals lead to ethical behaviour. Additionally, I will combine these empirical results with more traditional philosophical methods to further the conceptual understanding of counterfactual explainability in the realm of AI decisions.

     

    [/item]

    [item title="Research Interests"]

    • Decision Making
    • Imagination
    • Counterfactual Reasoning
    • Heuristics and Biases

    [/item]

    [item title="Education"]

    • 2021, MSc Applied Social Psychology, Higher School of Economics Moscow, Russia
    • 2021, MSc Economic Psychology, University of Tilburg, Netherlands
    • 2020, Study Abroad, Ca’ Foscari, Venice, Italy
    • 2019, BA (Hons) Psychology & Philosophy, University of Stirling, Scotland
    • 2018, Study Abroad, City University Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    [/item]

    [item title="Professional and Academic Career"]

    Company Internships i.a.

    • 2021, UX & Design Research/Data Intern, Bang & Olufsen, Struer, Denmark
    • 2019, Human Rights Research Intern, Clifford Chance, London, England
    • 2018, Human Resources Intern, UPM, Krakow, Poland

    [/item]

    [item title="Publications"]

    • Stuart, Michael T., McLoone, Brian and Grützner, Cassandra. Counterpossible Reasoning in Biology. (Under Review.)

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Talks"]

    • 2022. “tba” German-Baltic Conference on Sustainability & Digital Systems, Riga, Latvia, October 27-30. (Invited as a Youth Ambassador to discuss problems (and solutions) for AI and policy)

    • 2022. “Behavioural Data Governance - the feasibility of data leak prevention through nudging” The Philosophy of Data Science: Data Science Governance, Centre for Human & Machine Intelligence (HMI), Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Frankfurt, Germany, June 10-11, with R. Ruehle, M. Appels and M. Goldmann

    • 2021. ”A taxonomy of LPs” filozofikon, Uniwersytet Śląski, online, December 4-5

    • 2021, Modal Modelling in Science: Modal Epistemology Meets Philosophy of Science, “Counterpossible Reasoning in Biology: An Empirical Study.” with B. McLoone and M.T. Stuart, KTH Stockholm, Sweden.

    [/item]

    [item title="Summer/Winter Schools (with Research/Paper presentation)"]

    • 2022. “Counterfactuals and Risk Assessment” Society for Imprecise Probabilities: Theories and Applications (SIPTA) Summer School, Bristol, UK, August 15 – 19
    • 2022. “Counterfactuals and Risk Assessment” International Rationality Summer Institute (IRSI), University of Heidelberg, Landau, Germany, July 24 – August 5
    • 2022. “Game Theory, Prisoners’ Dilemma and Climate Change” Seasonal School on the Ethics of ClimateChange, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy, February 21-25

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Posters"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Awards/Scholarships"]

    • Merit Award of the Fondazione Il Talento all’Opera Onlus for my contributions to the Ethics of Climate Change Seasonal School (450€)
    • Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes – Masters Scholarship
    • Higher School of Economics Merit Scholarship – Tuition Waiver and Accom-modation Coverage
    • Antony Duff Research Prize – University of Stirling, Law and Philosophy De-partment, awarded for research excellence as demonstrated by my BA dissertation
    • Undergraduate of the Year 2019 Awards – Honourable Mention by Target Jobs & Clifford Chance

    [/item]

    [item title="Memberships"]

    • N/A

    [/item]
    [/accordion]

  • 10.12.2021

     ilozumba

    Title of Dissertation: Reframing Data Privacy in Business Using the Do No Harm Principle as an Ethical Focal Point

    Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Andreas Suchanek
    University: HHL – Handelshochschule Leipzig
    Scholarship: Karl Schlecht Stiftung
    Cohort: 8th Cohort, since 2021
    Email: Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist vor Spambots geschützt! Zur Anzeige muss JavaScript eingeschaltet sein.

    [accordion activeIndex=""]

    [item title="Short Abstract"]

    Problem:

    The study aims to redefine the narrative associated with the current privacy concepts in the business context and provide an ethical foundation of legitimacy for businesses to handle user data responsibly, thereby reducing or managing illegitimate harms. Point Merely adhering to privacy laws and regulations is insufficient for averting privacy breaches within firms. A fundamental ethical focal point, universally applicable, is indispensable. Such a framework would function as a medium for shared understanding between businesses and their clientele, fostering collaboration and ensuring proactive prevention of privacy violations. This fundamental ethical focal point is the do-no-harm principle.

    Main point:

    What can we legitimately expect from each privacy actor, be it a data controller or a data subject?

    Research Questions:

    1. Can privacy be conceptualized?

    2. How is data privacy conceptualized in the GDPR law?

    3. Under what conditions can privacy harms be qualified as legitimate or illegitimate?

    4. What can we legitimately expect from companies as private data controllers?

    [/item]

    [item title="Research Interests"]

    • Business Ethics
    • Legitimacy and Corporate Governance
    • Ethics of AI in Business
    • Philosophical Ethics
    • Philosophy of Technology
    • Feminist philosophy

    [/item]

    [item title="Education"]

    • 2016-2018: Master of Philosophy in Philosophical Ethics and Anthropology, Italy
    • 2013-2016: Bachelor of Philosophy, Italy
    • 2005-2010: Bachelor of Science in Pure and Industrial Chemistry, Nigeria

    [/item]

    [item title="Professional and Academic Career"]

    • 2021-2022: Assistant Professor Business and Professional Ethics (Contract) Dublin City University Business School
    • 2018-2021: Full-Time Faculty of Philosophical Ethics and Anthropology, Pan-Atlantic University – Lagos Business School, Lagos, Nigeria
    • 2016-2017: Program Coordinator for JUMP Leadership Program, International Cultural Centre Rocca Romana, Rome, Italy
    • 2012: Procurement Officer, Juhel Nigeria Limited, Enugu, Nigeria

    [/item]

    [item title="Publications"]

    • Daza, Marco Tulio, and Ilozumba Usochi Joanann. 2022. ‘A Survey of AI Ethics in Business Literature: Maps and Trends between 2000 and 2021’. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (December): 1042661. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1042661.
    • Ilozumba, Usochi Joanann. “Common Good Principle.” In Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics, ed. Deborah C. Poff and Alex C. Micha-los, 1–5. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_522-1
    • Ilozumba, Usochi. “The Home as the Primary Source of Intellectual Develo-pment: From a Phenomenological and Anthropological Perspective.” In Pe-ople, Care and Work in the Home, ed. M Gamal Abdelmonem and Antonio Argandoña, 110-124. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, 2020.

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Talks"]

    • 2020: New Waves in Feminism, “Feminism, A Relic of History or A Need? Unmasking a New Standpoint to Difference Feminism’s View on Women”, Nigeria

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Posters"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Memberships"]

    • Society for Business Ethics
    • Member of Research Group, Virtue Ethics in Business (VEiB), Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

    [/item]
    [/accordion]

  • 10.12.2021

     klingbeil

    Title of Dissertation: Experimental Analysis of Various Trust Repair Methods and Their Dependance on Influence Factors in Human-Machine Interactions

    Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Philipp Schreck
    University: Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
    Scholarship: Scholarship by the sdw (Foundation of German Business)
    Cohort: 8th Cohort, since 2021
    Email: Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist vor Spambots geschützt! Zur Anzeige muss JavaScript eingeschaltet sein.

    [accordion activeIndex=""]

    [item title="Short Abstract"]

    Autonomous systems are entering human lives in form of various applications, such as self-driving cars, autonomous drones, personal home assistants, social robots for teaching and autonomous medical systems. Many of these new functions involve complex social interactions with humans, transforming the role of machines from being viewed as tools to being perceived as partners. As collaboration between humans and autonomous systems is increasingly characterized by social behavior, trust as one of the major components of human interaction is gaining attention in human-autonomy research. In this context, one common phenomenon in human relationships is trust betrayal, which occurs when one person violates the trust of another person. As faultless performance of autonomous systems is highly unlikely, errors by machines will occur and their negative impact on human trust should be examined. Consequently, appropriate measures to restrengthen the human-autonomy trust relationship should be considered and designed. Nevertheless, studies on the concept of trust repair, which is defined as actions aimed at restoring violated trust, are only emerging in the field of human-machine interaction. Previous trust repair research has mostly focused on human-human interactions. The applicability of its findings to interactions with technology must be confirmed experimentally, as several studies have identified differences between human-autonomy and human-human relationships concerning trust development and impact of trustworthiness. First results from human-autonomy trust repair have been published in recent years, indicating great potential for further scientific efforts. The current research proposal aims to contribute to this field, by examining the effectiveness of various trust repair methods of autonomous agents and their dependence from several influential factors, such as anthropomorphism of the agent and technological experience of the human participant. The chosen method is an approach combining experiments with surveys, thereby enabling the analysis of both, behavioral and attitudinal data.

    [/item]

    [item title="Research Interests"]

    • Business Ethics
    • Trust and Trust Repair
    • Experimental and Behavioural Studies
    • Human-Machine Interaction
    • Artificial Intelligence

    [/item]

    [item title="Education"]

    • 2018, Master of Science, Industrial Engineering and Management, Technical University Berlin, Germany
    • 2014, Bachelor of Science, Industrial Engineering and Management, Technical University Berlin, Germany

    [/item]

    [item title="Professional and Academic Career"]

    • 2019-2021, management consultant, Boston Consulting Group GmbH, Berlin, Germany
    • 2014-2018, various internships in automotive, auditing and consulting, Berlin and Munich, Germany

    [/item]

    [item title="Publications"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Talks"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Posters"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Memberships"]

    • N/A

    [/item]
    [/accordion]

  • 10.12.2021

     klingbeil

    Title of Dissertation: Consumer Decisions and the Trade-off between Economic and Moral Objectives. An Investigation of Responsible Consumer Behavior Using the Ordonomic Approach

    Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ingo Pies
    University: Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
    Scholarship:
    Cohort: 9th Cohort, since 2022
    Email:

    [accordion activeIndex=""]

    [item title="Short Abstract"]

    In recent years, the role of the consumer in the transformation towards a more sustainable society has increasingly become the focus of scientific research. While there is a general consent that consumers contribute to the social and environmental externalities of the market economy through their usage and disposal behavior, there are differing concepts about which norms consumers should (and can) follow. Some normative approaches develop clear principles for consumer behaviour, others focus on general criteria for „wise consumption choices”, embedded in a broader concept of a “good lifestyle”.

    The work provides a systematic overview of the main theories of consumer ethics. The aim is to critically evaluate the various normative concepts and to assess the extent to which they take into account the underlying dilemma structures and Homann's condition of reasonability.

    The conceptual framework provided by the ordonomic approach (Pies 2017) is applied to discuss potential win-win solutions that have higher chances of success in fostering consumption patterns which are in line with sustainability and climate protection goals, without necessarily imposing normative unanimity, thus accommodating the demands of liberal societies.

    [/item]

    [item title="Research Interests"]

    • Behavioural Economics
    • Consumer Ethics
    • Collective Action
    • Order Ethics

    [/item]

    [item title="Education"]

    • Since 2022 International Doctoral Program “Ethics and Responsible Leadership in Business”, Wittenberg-Center for Global Ethics, Wittenberg, Germany
    • 2021, Master of Science, Economics, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
    • 2020, Master of Arts, Angewandte Ethik und Konfliktmanagement, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
    • 2019, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Semester Abroad, The Netherlands
    • 2017, Bachelor, Volkswirtschaftslehre, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany

    [/item]

    [item title="Professional and Academic Career"]

    • 2022, research associate, Chair of Economic and Business Ethics HHL Leipzig, Germany
    • 2022, project staff “Nudging Corporate Compliance and Integrity – Based on the Ethical Compass“, project of the WCGE in cooperation with the HHL, Wittenberg, Germany

    [/item]

    [item title="Publications"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Talks"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Posters"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Memberships"]

    • N/A

    [/item]
    [/accordion]

  • 10.12.2021

     klingbeil

    Title of Dissertation: An infinite understanding of the game as prerequisite to self-limitation in apparel consumption

    Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Andreas Suchanek
    University: HHL Graduate School of Management
    Scholarship: Karl Schlecht Stiftung
    Cohort: 9th Cohort, since 2022
    Email:

    [accordion activeIndex=""]

    [item title="Short Abstract"]

    This PhD project intends to scientifically contribute to the overarching question on how to foster sustainability by incentivizing self-limitation. The project understands self-limitation as investment in the sense of restraining from action (To not do something). Restraint though may lead to opportunity costs of e.g., not foregoing a venture. The return, on the other hand, – sustainability – not just only pays off in the long term; it is also a common good, incentivizing other actors to free rider behavior. (Suchanek 2022)

    Within this context, the project intends to shift its focus of analysis on self-limitation in consumption. Against the background of the severe negative ecological and social effects of (over-)consumption, self-limitation is being understood as normative moral claim. The evaluation of this claim shall be conducted in the light of the prevailing empirical conditions though, that substantially influence consumer behavior. Thereby, the project draws upon the manifold insights on the Value-Action-Gap in consumption and the role that temporal asymmetry and geographic distance play in its nurturing. This evaluation helps to draw conclusions on the practicability of the above-mentioned moral claim and circumvent potentially misguiding moralism.

    Following the theoretical conception of Ethical Focal Points (Suchanek, Entschew 2018), the project further bases its analysis on the role of individuals’ understanding of value for the acceptance and thus the pursuit of self-limitation. This points to the fact that actions are substantially influenced by values – and implicitly by the individual’s understanding about them.

    To strengthen this understanding, the project elaborates on the relevance of consumer education. It shows how the Value-Action-Gap can be reduced by consumer education, making use of implications by the Goal Framing (Lindenberg, Steg 2007) as well as Value-Belief-Norm (i.a. Stern 2000) theories. From this, the project derives and elaborates upon the role of corporates as educating entities due to their function as immediate consumer touchpoint.

    Given that the effectiveness of education highly depends on trust in the educating entity, the project intends to schematically conceptualize the relationship between self-limitation, education and trust. This conceptualization is presumed to foster the understanding for the role that trust plays in supporting self-limitation and sets the foundation for this project’s core analysis on how a corporate paradigm change from a finite towards an infinite understanding of the game works trust-enhancing. Thereby, the project intends to draw upon the philosophical insights on finite and infinite game theory by Carse (1986).

    To embed this project’s conceptual elaborations within a practical context, this dissertation will draw upon the example of apparel consumption. The apparel industry is viewed as fitting example, as business models vastly rely on over-consumption with devastating effects on the global ecology as well as society. Consumers heavily underlie the Value-Action-Gap when it comes to textile purchases. Despite ample knowledge on these effects, apparel consumption continues to display massive growth figures. At the same time, infinite minded business models in the sector prove successful in generating moderate, sustainable growth while stimulating mindful consumption among its customers.

    Based on this summarizing introduction, this PhD-project aspires to provide a comprehensive set of answers to the following research question: How can an infinite understanding of the game contribute to trustworthy consumer education that incentivizes self-limitation in apparel consumption?

    [/item]

    [item title="Research Interests"]

    • Self-limitation & Sustainability
    • Infinite vs. finite game theory
    • Consumer behaviour

    [/item]

    [item title="Education"]

    • 2016, MSc International Management, CEMS
    • 2016, MSc Finance, NOVA School of Business and Economics
    • 2014, BSc Business Administration and Economics, Universität Passau

    [/item]

    [item title="Professional and Academic Career"]

    • 2017-2022, Manager Management Consulting, EY-Parthenon, Munich, Germany

    [/item]

    [item title="Publications"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Talks"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Posters"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Memberships"]

    • N/A

    [/item]
    [/accordion]

  • 10.12.2021

     klingbeil

    Title of Dissertation: Just and trustworthy leadership? When algorithmic leaders enter ethically sensitive domains

    Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Philipp Schreck
    University: Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
    Scholarship:
    Cohort: 9th Cohort, since 2022
    Email:

    [accordion activeIndex=""]

    [item title="Short Abstract"]

    Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) enable algorithmic decision-making not only to assist humans but also to take over managerial tasks and thus leadership functions. The development of AI/ML-based models performing leadership functions entails that they also make high-stakes decisions in ethically sensitive domains such as healthcare or human resource management. Here, decisions have far-reaching consequences for the decision recipient’s life. The question arises of whether algorithmic leadership comes along with good leadership that implies ethics and efficiency. We consider this issue relevant because both aspects are arguably presumed in comparable human decision-making and leadership. However, various examples demonstrate that algorithmic decision-making can be biased, leading to undesired outcomes and perceptions. Therefore, we aim to research how algorithmic leadership should be used and designed that it is perceived as good leadership in ethically sensitive domains. We assume that algorithmic leadership is good when it is perceived as just and trustworthy by human leaders and followers. While the trust and justice perceptions of algorithmic decision-making are a noted research topic, only limited research to date explicitly addresses the new role of AI/ML-based models as leaders of humans and the resulting reconceptualization of organizational leadership. Our research project seeks to fill this research gap by analyzing how humans respond to the emergence of algorithmic leadership in terms of trust and justice perceptions. Methodologically, we strive to generate knowledge by testing hypotheses based on experimental research designs. With our research project, we contribute empirically to the new research field of algorithmic leadership.

    [/item]

    [item title="Research Interests"]

    • Digital Transformation / Artificial Intelligence
    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Leadership Studies
    • Decision-Making
    • Business Ethics

    [/item]

    [item title="Education"]

    • 2022, Master of Science, Business Administration & Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School
    • 2018, Bachelor of Science, Business Administration, University of Marburg
    • 2017, Exchange Semester, University of Bologna

    [/item]

    [item title="Professional and Academic Career"]

    • 2014, Vocational Training, Banking Professional & Financial Services, Volksbank Stuttgart eG

    [/item]

    [item title="Publications"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Talks"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Posters"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Memberships"]

    • N/A

    [/item]
    [/accordion]

  • 10.12.2021

     klingbeil

    Title of Dissertation: How Do Companies Tackle Societal Issues Successfully? A review of Corporate Purpose, Equity Ownership and Intrapreneurship

    Supervisor: Prof. Markus Beckmann
    University: Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
    Scholarship: KSG Scholarship
    Cohort: 9th Cohort, since 2022
    Email:

    [accordion activeIndex=""]

    [item title="Short Abstract"]

    Defining and embedding a Corporate Purpose is a fast-spreading practice across companies that has received little attention so far from Business Ethics scholars.

    Nevertheless, Purpose is an overarching ethical notion that can advance our understanding of how companies successfully tackle societal issues. Defining a purpose provides an organisation's meaningful and enduring reason to exist that aligns with long-term financial performance, unifies and motivates diverse stakeholders (Hurth et al., 2018). The existing evidence suggests that embedding a purpose in a company's core activities is a resource-intensive process and that maintaining a balance between commercial and societal logic is extraordinarily difficult to achieve (Battilana & Dorado, 2010).

    Through the lens of Institutional Theory and using new empirical data, this study is addressing a call (George et al., 2021) to study the rise and adoption of Corporate Purpose, including how the macro driver of Equity Ownership and the micro force of Intrapreneurship contribute separately as well as concurrently.

    The research findings bring a unique and timely contribution that contributes to the conversation about how companies successfully tackle societal issues and moves forward the work of Positive Organizational Scholarship and Management - mainly Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics.

    [/item]

    [item title="Research Interests"]

    • Equity Ownership, Steward Ownership (Verantwortungseigentum), Co-operatives
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Sustainable Business
    • Corporate Purpose
    • Intrapreneurship
    • Leadership

    [/item]

    [item title="Education"]

    • 2017, Postgraduate Certificate in Sustainable Value Chains, The University of Cambridge, Institute for Sustainability Leadership, UK
    • 2010, MSc in Management, HEC Lausanne, CH
    • 2007, BSc in Business Administration, Università degli Studi di RomaTre, IT

    [/item]

    [item title="Professional and Academic Career"]

    • 2018 – Today, Founder and Managing Director, Purpose House, Berlin, DE
    • 2019 – 2020, Challenge Director, Business Fights Poverty, London, UK
    • 2011 – 2018, Global Consumer Insights Partner, Unilever Plc, London UK

    [/item]

    [item title="Publications"]

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Talks"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Posters"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Memberships"]

    • Member of Impact Hub Berlin, a network of impact-driven entrepreneurs.
    • Member of the think-tank Sustainable Purpose Practitioners led by the Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership.
    • Fellow of the League of Intrapreneurs, a global community of corporate and institutional change agents.

    [/item]
    [/accordion]

  • 10.12.2021

     klingbeil

    Title of Dissertation: From Intentions to Actions: Exploring the Integration of Sustainability in Organizational Practices

    Supervisor: Prof. Markus Beckmann
    University: Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
    Scholarship: Application for the Klaus Murmann Scholarship
    Cohort: 9th Cohort, since 2022
    Email: Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist vor Spambots geschützt! Zur Anzeige muss JavaScript eingeschaltet sein.

    [accordion activeIndex=""]

    [item title="Short Abstract"]

    Over the past decades, industrialized countries have engaged in discussions regarding resource and environmental challenges, leading to a scientific consensus on the limits of the natural environment's carrying capacity. Recent reports, such as the Global Risks Report by the World Economic Forum, highlight the urgent need for sustainable development, which has become a guiding principle for decision-making at various levels of society, including businesses.

    As expectations for and in corporations to transform the economy and address sus-tainability challenges have risen, companies are now considering social and ecological aspects in their business decisions and practices. This shift toward sustainability in companies is the primary research focus of this cumulative dissertation.

    My research aims to address two fundamental problems related to corporate sustain-ability, with a specific emphasis on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The first problem is related to the distinct characteristics of SMEs, such as closeness to the corporate’s environment or limited financial and human resources, that influence the sustainability integration and thus the response to different expectations. Thus, I am investigating the impact of certain expectations on sustainability change under those SME-specific conditions, exploring the underlying mechanisms and processes that drive or hinder change in SMEs. To gain these insights, I am, for example, examining the influence of non-financial reporting on sustainability integration of different levels of SMEs. The second problem I am addressing in my PhD pertains to the concept of "sustainability maturity". The objective is to develop a comprehensive understanding of what sustainability maturity entails, recognizing its context-dependent nature which often remains unconsidered.

    By delving into the influences of different expectations on change mechanisms and process and comprehensively examining sustainability maturity, this research endeav-ours to enrich the understanding of sustainable practices and foster more effective and responsible approaches for corporate sustainability change of SMEs.

    [/item]

    [item title="Research Interests"]

    • Corporate Sustainability Management

       

    • Corporate Social Responsibility

    • Corporate Purpose

    • Business Ethics

    [/item]

    [item title="Education"]

    • 2022, Master of Arts, Technische Universität Dresden, Internationales Hochschulinstitut Zittau, Germany
    • 2020, Bachelor of Arts, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany

    [/item]

    [item title="Professional and Academic Career"]

    • 2023 - Today, project management, Wittenberg Center of Global Ethics, Lutherstadt Wittenberg, Germany
    • 2021 - 2022, senior student assistant (WHK), Technische Universität Dresden Internationales Hochschulinstitut Zittau, Zittau, Germany 
    • 2020 - 2021, senior student assistant (WHK), Hochschule Zittau, Zittau, Germany
    • 2019 - 2020, student assistant (SHK), Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation IFF, Magdeburg, Germany
    • 2018, student intern, T-Systems International GmbH, Berlin, Germany

    [/item]

    [item title="Publications"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Talks"]

    • NAMA conference, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany, 5 – 7 October 2022, Paper: “Nachhaltige Transformation und standardisierte Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen: Eine Analyse am Beispiel des Deutschen Nachhaltigkeitskodex“

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Posters"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Memberships"]

    • 2021-2022, sneep e.V. (student network for ethics in economics and practice)

    [/item]

    [item title="Awards"]

    • 2020, Best Bachelor's Degree of the Faculty of Human Sciences

    [/item]
    [/accordion]

     

  • 10.12.2021

     klingbeil

    Title of Dissertation: The Business Case for Corporate Digital Responsibility in Managing the Twin-Transformation

    Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Philipp Schreck
    University: University of Halle/Wittenberg
    Scholarship: Karl-Schlecht Stiftung
    Cohort: 10th Cohort, since 2023
    Email: Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist vor Spambots geschützt! Zur Anzeige muss JavaScript eingeschaltet sein.

    [accordion activeIndex=""]

    [item title="Short Abstract"]

    Companies worldwide are facing increasing challenges due to the fast pace of digitalization and a growing pressure to find sustainable solutions to urgent social and environmental problems of our times. The complex interplay between technological, societal, and regulatory developments, as well as recent disruptive events such as the COVID-19 pandemic or Russia's war against Ukraine, are bringing about rapid changes to the business landscape.

    In a result, businesses are compelled to find new ways to effectively manage the so-called twin-transformation. This term, introduced by Alexander Brink, describes the combined, simultaneous and parallel development of two transformative game-changers of the 21st century: digitalization and sustainability (cf. Brink 2022, p. 150). The proposed dissertation project seeks to explore the management of the twin-transformation in companies by analysing the following guiding research question: How can companies balance the opportunities and risks of digitalization while fulfilling their corporate responsibility to generate sustainable value for the company, society and the environment?

    To answer this question, one approach has gained considerable attention in recent years: Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) (cf. Dörr 2020, p. 28; Trittin‐Ulbrich and Böckel 2022, p. 452). CDR can be defined as voluntary business activities that go beyond legal requirements and that aim to actively shape the digital world in the interests of consumers and for the benefits of society (cf. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, nukleare Sicherheit und Verbraucherschutz 2021, p. 2). However, until today there is little empirical evidence on existing CDR business practice patterns, its underlying motives and the socio-contextual mechanisms that influence them. In addition to that, the conceptualization of CDR and its theoretical understanding are still in its early stages and predominantly cover the topic from a digital risk management perspective. To overcome this limitation, the proposed dissertation project aims to develop a deeper understanding of CDR as an integrative management practice for disvalue mitigation and value creation, putting a particular focus on the less explored topic of value creation form a holistic business ethics perspective.

    To achieve this goal, the proposed research project will review the existing CDR literature and its historical roots within the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and digital ethics discourse. Furthermore, the literature review will be complemented by a review of the social intrapreneurship literature that relates to the topic of digitalization and sustainability. An integrative analysis might promise new insights to understand the business case and, in particular, the role of sustainability-orientated digital innovations as a promising, but still underestimated practice of value creation in the concept of CDR.

    In preparation of the empirical part of the study, existing meta-theoretical frameworks for analysing CDR in practice will be shortly discussed. Depending on the research findings, a suitable theoretical framework, e.g., Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice, will be introduced as an alternative and holistic framework for analysing CDR in corporate practice.

    In the empirical part of the proposed dissertation project, a multi-case study design will be used to explore the business case of CDR. Following a mixed-method research approach, qualitative methods, such as e.g., semi-structured expert interviews will be applied to generate richer insights into the currently carried out CDR practices. Quantitative methods, such as surveys or experiments, will then be used to verify identified patterns in the datasets. The results promise to provide a valuable database for an in-depth discussion on the CDR concept, which will be realized in a case-specific and theory-based examination of the results and conclude in answering the research question. One potential outcome of the research could be a typology of CDR practices. Furthermore, the findings will allow to formulate an outlook on possible implications for management research and practice alike.

     

    [/item]

    [item title="Research Interests"]

    • Corporate Digital Responsibility

    • Digital Ethics

    • Social Intrapreneurship

    [/item]

    [item title="Education"]

    • 2016, Master of Arts, International Cultural Business Studies, University of Passau, Germany
    • 2014, Study aboard, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México, Mexico
    • 2013, Licenciatura, Intercultural Economic Management, University of Salvador, Argentina
    • 2013, Bachelor of Arts, International Cultural and Business Studies, University of Passau

    [/item]

    [item title="Professional and Academic Career"]

    • 2020, AI Ethics and Governance Project Coordinator, Mercedes-Benz Group AG, Stuttgart, Germany
    • 2019, Diversity & Inclusion Specialist, Daimler AG, Stuttgart, Germany
    • 2016, Integrity Change Project Coordinator, Daimler AG, Stuttgart Germany
    • 2013, Student Assistant, Chair of Intercultural Management, University of Passau, Germany

    [/item]

    [item title="Publications"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Talks"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Conference Contributions: Posters"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Memberships"]

    • N/A

    [/item]

    [item title="Awards"]

    • N/A

    [/item]
    [/accordion]